Archive for the ‘Santee Cooper’ Category

Hello…. Anybody home at Santee Cooper?

Sunday, December 23rd, 2007

Why would Santee Cooper want to build a coal fired plant when solar panels sell for less than $1 a watt?

Is it possible that Santee Cooper has not seen the news! Nanosolar, is the first solar panel manufacturer to be able to profitably sell solar panels for less than $1 a watt. That is the price at which solar energy becomes less expensive than coal.

“With a $1-per-watt panel, it is possible to build $2-per-watt systems.”

According to the Energy Department, building a new coal plant costs about $2.1 a watt, plus the cost of fuel and emissions.

The panels, which are manufactured at plants in Silicon Valley and Germany, are the first to be sold for less than a dollar per watt and still be profitable for Nanosolar.

“This is the first time that a solar-electricity cell and panel have been designed entirely and specifically for utility-scale power generation,” Nanosolar CEO Martin Roscheisen said in a written statement. “It will set the standard for green power generation at utility scale.”

This would allow an entire system to be built for less than 2 dollars a watt, 0.1 dollars cheaper than the costs of a coal plant, which are also taking more time to be built and damage the environment. The real big plus is no fuel to buy. no emissions. and no more mercury in our waters.

Renewable energy is in very exciting times, and only the beginning.

Why is Santee Cooper so hard nosed about not allowing homeowners, businesses, school districts, and county governments the right to true “Net Metering”. With solar panels now being sold at less than a $1 a watt, just think of how much money our schools, county governments, and you would save each year. Wouldn’t it be nice to have a school tax reduction?

Is Santee Cooper so mucked up and focused on old coal technology that they are stopping everyone from even having the ability to try all the great new trends just beginning.

The time has now come for everyone to demand “TRUE NET METERING” from Santee Cooper!

Hello…. Is Anybody home at Santee Cooper?





ONE REASON SANTEE COOPER DOESN’T ALLOW NET METERING

Saturday, May 5th, 2007

Consider this concept that the future could bring to South Carolina.
Let’s imagine that Santee Cooper allowed net metering and everyone started buying all-electric cars powering South Carolina’s commuters to work every day, petroleum free, and more people started putting solar-electric panels on their roofs.  If you spend $20-30 thousand for a 5,000 kW solar electric system at your home with net-metering (the utility has to zero out your electric bill if you produce as much or more than you use on a monthly or other time basis) it will eventually pay for itself through conventional electricity use (dishwashers, lights, refrigerators). However, if you are using an all-electric car to drive 30-50 miles per day, and every night you are fueling it by plugging it into your net-metered home, the pay-off comes even faster. In essence, with enough solar panels, your home becomes a private power plant for home use AND to power most transport needs. The panels don’t generate at night, but with net metering, it doesn’t matter. The juice the car uses plugged in at night is likely more than made up for by the net metered electricity pumped out during the day when commuters are at work and using little at home. If this vision really took hold it would be a “disruptive” technological advance in the extreme.

Why? Well, let’s say just 10% of homes went this route. And they did it to the extent that with net-metering their net electric use from the outside grid is zero. Where does that leave Santee Cooper? They have a vested interest in big power plants cranking out juice they get paid to dole out. If individual users reduced demand by 10% and their neighbors started seeing happy people paying no gasoline or electricity bills after their up-front solar investment (which technology is making cheaper every day and may be cut in half in two years), it just might catch on. However, de-centralized energy production does not make the utility empire expand. Big new power plants do. Who has more lobbyists at the state and federal level, Santee Cooper or individual homeowners trying to generate political favor for these concepts? Pretty easy answer to that question.

Do you get the picture of why Santee Cooper won’t allow net metering? These ideas are going to have to be fought for to become reality. A lot of home owners will have to make their voices heard, it won’t be easy. It is for sure that our world is rapidly changing, photovoltaic cells keep getting cheaper every day and more electric vehicles are coming onto the market every year. It sure doesn’t look like to far a stretch to see people driving to work on photons!

Santee Cooper may not like it because their demand may go down someday because of the masses taking to this concept, but no one should care, after all it is a state owned utility that should be concerned about supporting a better way of life to the people of South Carolina! I believe this is a look at the future when Santee Cooper allows net metering!!!

Don’t forget the best part, We’d be giving Hugo Chavez and the Iranian Mullahs the finger!!!


FireStats iconPowered by FireStats